ARTFUL DODGERS
BY MIKE SMITH

On its own terms, the visceral chaos of war is unmatched. But the blood spilled on the battlefield and the
bombast of the propaganda maker have always been turned on their heads by the artist, frothing rhetoric and
flying bits of bone transformed into calm horror and splatterings of paint. Franco's Guernica civilian
bombardment becomes Picasso's Guernica masterpiece. In theory, art also has advantages in that it needn't
worry about impressing the brass. But in one of my favourite war-themed ironies, a group of artists had their
anti-war art banned from the Artists Against War-organized One Big No, the peace festival that bloomed in
Nathan Phillips Square on Saturday. Weirdly, everyone involved tells the story differently.

We started investigating when NOW received a press release charging that some artists had been censored by
City Hall. One of the fugitive pieces contained a supposedly unpopular word, and at least eight other works
followed, allegedly either axed or gone AWOL in protest.

I spoke with Glenn Guerin, curator of the Noxious Art Group, who had been chosen by organizers to round up
anti-war artists. But Guerin says that three days before the event he was informed by organizers that City Hall
had banned a piece, and ultimately he was told that artists whose participation he had arranged would not be
allowed to show their works after all.

Now Guerin says he never dealt directly with City Hall and that it was Artists Against War who told him that Menno
Krant's art had been banned by a city "visual art approval committee" because it contained the nasty word. He
also learned that Krant's second piece, which contained no profanity, was also banned.

And then, he says, he was told that AAW itself had banned two other works. He maintains that organizers said
they "wouldn't even show them to the City Hall committee," presumably because the committee was being so
hard-nosed on the art that there was no point.

But AAW organizers see the whole matter entirely differently. They say a single piece by Krant was banned by
City Hall because it contained the text "Make love, fuck Bush," and the rest were cut due to logistical constraints.
They say they never even reviewed the work of Guerin's other artists.

"Really, the only problem the city had was with one piece," Christie Findlay of AAW tells me. The others were cut
due to time constraints. "We had a lot of people who wanted to be in those tents," says Findlay. (It was a powerful
little show. One simple sculpture of a cloaked figure brought me to tears.)

Then I called City Hall to discover that folks there believe they didn't censor anything at all. Marguerite Reid of
City Hall's special events desk, who spent most of a day "collecting information" after my phone query, maintains
that the city didn't have a problem at all. She tells me it usually requires "eight weeks for all the material to get
passed through an application." Art might be banned because it's deemed to contravene the Human Rights Code
or has a possibility of "offending."

You guessed it. There's nothing in the Human Rights Code banning words related to fornication. (No, I don't mind
if you look that up.) We're strictly on our own when it comes to dirty words. When I ask what the city's complaint
was about a word you could have heard on numerous street corners during the time of the festival, Reid tells me
it had none.

"It was actually the organizers who made that decision" to censor both Krant's piece and others, she says. I listen
carefully to hear the buck being passed in the background. "The organizers said yes and no to various artists,"
says Reid. There it is.

I reread some correspondence between Guerin and random organizers. It seems AAW types complained that
Guerin did not respect their processes. "If (he) had been part of the organizing process instead of simply taking
advantage of the venue provided...," one wrote.

"In the end, it is our event," wrote an organizer, "and we'll decide what goes into it."

This makes me nervous. To me, City Hall actually felt more accountable than Artists Against War (one phone call
before I knew who to talk to vs. three phone calls and three e-mails). Certainly, much blame must go to City Hall
(whoever that is) for having the power to encourage self-censorship, but it looks a lot like the organizers didn't
exactly put up a fight.

Either way, I'm left wondering why an event dealing with two of humanity's most powerful and devastating
inventions -- art and war -- was expected by some to be a strictly vanilla affair. Picasso didn't paint the beautiful,
and war doesn't have to look like a street party.

NOW Magazine- Toronto  | APR 16 - 22, 2003 | VOL. 22 NO. 33
Menno Krant
Photo By Joshua Meles
HOME
Back to Gallery Page
REVIEWS & PRESS   page 2
CLICK this LInk for the original article :  NOW Magazine


Who Banished this Piece by Menno Krant from  the One  Big NO fest?
Click for Page 3